Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 09:41

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump speech prompts concerns about politicization of military - NBC News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
The One Habit an Oncologist Recommends Everyone Add by Age 40 - Eat This Not That
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How the Brain Actively Removes Unwanted Memories - Neuroscience News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why does Rahul Gandhi have so many haters?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Georgia-Alabama game time, TV Network among those announced by ESPN - DawgNation
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?